No

Posted by shyla at 7:15pm Sep 3 '09
You must sign in to send shyla a message
Not only is it unconstitutional but it would also be a dreadful waste of time and expense. There are countless sex offenders, especially in urban areas, that aren't even labeled as 'pedophile'. Even if there is a quick way to filter the differences, it would be a powerful waste of time and money compared to the amount of pedophiles and the actuality of finding the right one. It would be ineffective, I don't doubt.


There are 148 private posts in this thread. You need sign in to read them.
Below are the public posts in this thread:
You currently have read-only access to this board. You must request an account to join the conversation.
Why Join 4thKingdom?
Note that there are no ads here. Just intelligent and friendly conversation. We keep the spam out, the trolls out, the advertisers out... 4K is just a low-key, old-fashioned site with members from around the world.
This community began in 1998, and we continue to accept new members today.

If you're looking for a richer experience than Facebook or Twitter, this is it.

Debate & News
Current Events
Debates
Diversity
Guys Vs Girls
Politics
Science & Technology
Extreme
Controversy
Holy War
Help & Advice
Computers
Health & Fitness
Personal Finance
Lifestyle
Religion & Spirituality
Media & Arts
Art & Photography
Literature
Media & Culture
Movies
Music
Poetry & Writing
Television
Special Interest
Cooking
Gaming
Philosophy & Quotations
Sports
Travel