CATO says immigration restrictions hurt us all

Posted by
Sir Four at 9:29am Jan 23 '10
You must sign in to send Sir Four a message
SourceThis study finds that increased enforcement and reduced low-skilled immigration have a significant negative impact on the income of U.S. households. Modest savings in public expenditures would be more than offset by losses in economic output and job opportunities for more skilled American workers. A policy that reduces the number of low-skilled immigrant workers by 28.6 percent compared to projected levels would reduce U.S. household welfare by about 0.5 percent, or $80 billion.
In contrast, legalization of low-skilled immigrant workers would yield significant income gains for American workers and households. Legalization would eliminate smugglers' fees and other costs faced by illegal immigrants. It would also allow immigrants to have higher productivity and create more openings for Americans in higherskilled occupations. The positive impact for U.S. households of legalization under an optimal visa tax would be 1.27 percent of GDP or $180 billion.
Yet another study that finds these immigrants are a net positive on our economy, rather than simply a drain on public funds.
There are 4 private posts in this thread. You need
sign in to read them.
Below are the public posts in this thread:
-
CATO says immigration restrictions hurt us all - Sir Four 9:29am Jan 23 '10
You currently have read-only access to this board. You must
request an account to join the conversation.
Why Join 4thKingdom?
Note that there are no ads here. Just intelligent and friendly conversation. We keep
the spam out, the trolls out, the advertisers out... 4K is just a low-key, old-fashioned
site with members from around the world.
This community began in 1998, and we continue to accept new members today.
If you're looking for a richer experience than Facebook or Twitter,
this is it.
Debate & News
Extreme
Help & Advice
Lifestyle
Media & Arts
Special Interest